↓ Skip to main content

Chiari’s Network as a Cause of Fetal and Neonatal Pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Chiari’s Network as a Cause of Fetal and Neonatal Pathology
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00246-011-0114-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatiha Bendadi, David A. van Tijn, Lou Pistorius, Matthias W. Freund

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 55%
Computer Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,687,335
of 23,392,375 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#286
of 1,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,589
of 127,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,392,375 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.