| Title |
Degradation of aged nitrocellulose investigated by thermal analysis and chemiluminescence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10973-011-1746-8 |
| Authors |
Jozef Rychlý, Agnes Lattuati-Derieux, Lyda Matisová-Rychlá, Katarína Csomorová, Ivica Janigová, Bertrand Lavédrine |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 28% |
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 16 | 40% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 23% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,232,984
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#134
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,695
of 117,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.