| Title |
Cognitive Enhancement, Rational Choice and Justification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroethics, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-012-9173-5 |
| Authors |
Veljko Dubljević |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 26% |
| Unknown | 8 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 5 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 28% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2013.
All research outputs
#4,130,267
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#249
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,304
of 279,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.