You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On-line monitoring of large cultivations of microalgae and cyanobacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Biotechnology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ivo Havlik, Patrick Lindner, Thomas Scheper, Kenneth F. Reardon |
| Abstract |
Large cultivations of microalgae will benefit from on-line monitoring to achieve process control and improved productivity. This monitoring requires reliable sensors for on-line, in situ measurement of both physicochemical and biological process variables. Although standard industrial sensors can be used for many physicochemical variables, monitoring methods for most biological quantities rely on sensors that are currently suitable only for laboratory scale or off-line use. Here, we review these methods and discuss new approaches that could be adapted. We suggest that these new methods should be noninvasive and based on approaches that have already been applied to other bioprocesses; examples discussed here are in situ microscopy, flow cytometry (FC), IR spectroscopy, and software sensors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 22% |
| Researcher | 48 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 25% |
| Engineering | 42 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,221,941
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#589
of 2,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,843
of 208,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.