↓ Skip to main content

Paul Ehrenfest on the Necessity of Quanta (1911): Discontinuity, Quantization, Corpuscularity, and Adiabatic Invariance

Overview of attention for article published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Paul Ehrenfest on the Necessity of Quanta (1911): Discontinuity, Quantization, Corpuscularity, and Adiabatic Invariance
Published in
Archive for History of Exact Sciences, April 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00407-003-0068-z
Authors

Luis Navarro, Enric Pérez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Other 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 38%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#85
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,061
of 60,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archive for History of Exact Sciences
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.