↓ Skip to main content

Risk and Resilience Factors Associated with Resident Burnout

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Psychiatry, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
Title
Risk and Resilience Factors Associated with Resident Burnout
Published in
Academic Psychiatry, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40596-016-0628-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deanna Chaukos, Emma Chad-Friedman, Darshan H. Mehta, Laura Byerly, Alper Celik, Thomas H. McCoy, John W. Denninger

Abstract

We investigated hypothesized risk and resilience factors and their association with burnout in first year medicine and psychiatry residents at an urban teaching hospital in order to help guide the development of interventions targeted at reducing burnout. We administered the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Perceived Stress Scale-10, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depression symptoms), Revised Life Orientation Test (optimism), Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale, Interpersonal Reactivity Index Perspective-Taking Scale (empathy), and Measure of Current Status-Part A to first year medicine and psychiatry residents prior to initiation of clinical rotations in June. The response rate was 91 % (68 of 75 residents). Nineteen respondents (28 %) met criteria for burnout as measured by the MBI. Residents with burnout scored higher on self-report measures assessing perceived stress (Cohen's d = 0.97; p = 0.004), fatigue (d = 0.79; p = 0.018), worry (d = 0.88; p = 0.0009), and depression symptoms (d = 0.84; p = 0.035) and scored lower on questionnaires assessing mindfulness (d = -0.63; p = 0.029) and coping ability (d = -0.79; p = 0.003). In a cross-sectional assessment using self-report measures, we found that nearly a third of first year residents prior to starting their internships experience burnout. They exhibit lower levels of mindfulness and coping skills and higher levels of depression symptoms, fatigue, worry, and stress. These preliminary findings should encourage programs to initiate and study curricula that combine mindfulness and self-awareness coping strategies to enhance or protect against burnout as well as cognitive behavioral coaching strategies to offset symptoms of burnout when present.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 318 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Researcher 28 9%
Other 25 8%
Other 78 25%
Unknown 74 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 37%
Psychology 52 16%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 90 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#20,376,559
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Academic Psychiatry
#1,229
of 1,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,573
of 420,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Psychiatry
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.