| Title |
The Impact of APA and AERA Guidelines on Effect Size Reporting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational Psychology Review, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10648-013-9218-2 |
| Authors |
Chao-Ying Joanne Peng, Li-Ting Chen, Hsu-Min Chiang, Yi-Chen Chiang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 28% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#12,684,199
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#433
of 619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,057
of 195,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.