| Title |
Critical role of transglutaminase and other stress proteins during neurodegenerative processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Amino Acids, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00726-009-0428-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Caccamo, Monica Currò, Salvatore Condello, Nadia Ferlazzo, Riccardo Ientile |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#497
of 1,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,472
of 165,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.