↓ Skip to main content

Metal Ion Physiopathology in Neurodegenerative Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroMolecular Medicine, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Metal Ion Physiopathology in Neurodegenerative Disorders
Published in
NeuroMolecular Medicine, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12017-009-8102-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Bolognin, Luigi Messori, Paolo Zatta

Abstract

Metal dyshomeostasis in the brain (BMD) has often been proposed as a possible cause for several neurodegenerative disorders (NDs). Nevertheless, the precise nature of the biochemical mechanisms of metal involvement in NDs is still largely unknown. Mounting evidence suggests that normal aging itself is characterized by, among other features, a significant degree of metal ion dysmetabolism in the brain. This is probably the result of a progressive deterioration of the metal regulatory systems and, at least in some cases, of life-long metal exposure and brain accumulation. Although alterations of metal metabolism do occur to some extent in normal aging, they appear to be highly enhanced under various neuropathological conditions, causing increased oxidative stress and favoring abnormal metal-protein interactions. Intriguingly, despite the fact that most common NDs have a distinct etiological basis, they share striking similarities as they are all characterized by a documented brain metal impairment. This review will primarily focus on the alterations of metal homeostasis that are observed in normal aging and in Alzheimer's disease. We also present a brief survey on BMD in other NDs (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Parkinson's, and Prion Protein disease) in order to highlight what represents the most reliable evidence supporting a crucial involvement of metals in neurodegeneration. The opportunities for metal-targeted pharmacological strategies in the major NDs are briefly outlined as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Lithuania 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 99 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,611
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#295
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,535
of 165,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.