↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder with tic symptoms: clinical presentation and treatment outcome

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder with tic symptoms: clinical presentation and treatment outcome
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00787-016-0936-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Davíð R. M. A. Højgaard, Gudmundur Skarphedinsson, Judith Becker Nissen, Katja A. Hybel, Tord Ivarsson, Per Hove Thomsen

Abstract

Some studies have shown that children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and co-morbid tics differ from those without co-morbid tics in terms of several demographic and clinical characteristics. However, not all studies have confirmed these differences. This study examined children and adolescents with OCD and with possible or definite tic specifiers according to the DSM-5 in order to see whether they differ from patients without any tic symptoms regarding clinical presentation and outcome of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The full sample included 269 patients (aged 7-17) with primary DSM-IV OCD who had participated in the Nordic Long-term Treatment Study (NordLOTS). Symptoms of tics were assessed using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (K-SADS-PL). One or more tic symptoms were found in 29.9% of participants. Those with OCD and co-morbid tic symptoms were more likely male, more likely to have onset of OCD at an earlier age, and differed in terms of OCD symptom presentation. More specifically, such participants also showed more symptoms of OCD-related impairment, externalization, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), social anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the two groups showed no difference in terms of OCD severity or outcome of CBT. Children and adolescents with OCD and co-morbid tic symptoms differ from those without tic symptoms in several aspects of clinical presentation, but not in their response to CBT. Our results underscore the effectiveness of CBT for tic-related OCD. Nordic Long-term Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) Treatment Study; www.controlled-trials.com ; ISRCTN66385119.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 13 8%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 52 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 49 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 54 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2016.
All research outputs
#13,161,085
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1,008
of 1,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,334
of 421,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.