Title |
Improving SAR estimations in MRI using subject-specific models
|
---|---|
Published in |
Physics in Medicine & Biology, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1088/0031-9155/57/24/8153 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jin Jin, Feng Liu, Ewald Weber, Stuart Crozier |
Abstract |
To monitor and strategically control energy deposition in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), measured as a specific absorption rate (SAR), numerical methods using generic human models have been employed to estimate worst-case values. Radiofrequency (RF) sequences are therefore often designed conservatively with large safety margins, potentially hindering the full potential of high-field systems. To more accurately predict the patient SAR values, we propose the use of image registration techniques, in conjunction with high-resolution image and tissue libraries, to create patient-specific voxel models. To test this, a matching model from the archives was first selected. Its tissue information was then warped to the patient's coordinates by registering the high-resolution library image to the pilot scan of the patient. Results from studying the models' 1 g SAR distribution suggest that the developed patient model can predict regions of elevated SAR within the patient with remarkable accuracy. Additionally, this work also proposes a voxel analytical metric that can assist in the construction of a patient library and the selection of the matching model from the library for a patient. It is hoped that, by developing voxel models with high accuracy in patient-specific anatomy and positioning, the proposed method can accurately predict the safety margins for high-field human applications and, therefore maximize the safe use of RF sequence power in high-field MRI systems. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 39% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 6 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 22 | 45% |
Physics and Astronomy | 8 | 16% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |