↓ Skip to main content

Developmental vitamin D deficiency and autism: Putative pathogenic mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developmental vitamin D deficiency and autism: Putative pathogenic mechanisms
Published in
Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.12.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asad Ali, Xiaoying Cui, Darryl Eyles

Abstract

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disease that presents in early life. Despite a considerable amount of studies, the neurobiological mechanisms underlying autism remain obscure. Both genetic and environmental factors are involved in the development of autism. Vitamin D deficiency is emerging as a consistently reported risk factor in children. One reason for the prominence now being given to this risk factor is that it would appear to interact with several other epidemiological risk factors for autism. Vitamin D is an active neurosteroid and plays crucial neuroprotective roles in the developing brain. It has important roles in cell proliferation and differentiation, immunomodulation, regulation of neurotransmission and steroidogenesis. Animal studies have suggested that transient prenatal vitamin D deficiency is associated with altered brain development. Here we review the potential neurobiological mechanisms linking prenatal vitamin D deficiency and autism and also discuss what future research targets must now be addressed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Other 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 45 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Psychology 10 7%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 50 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,463,208
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
#735
of 3,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,286
of 424,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Steroid Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.