You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validity of Daily and Weekly Self-Reported Training Load Measures in Adolescent Athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Padraic J. Phibbs, Gregory Roe, Ben Jones, Dale B. Read, Jonathon Weakley, Joshua Darrall-Jones, Kevin Till |
| Abstract |
Phibbs, PJ, Roe, G, Jones, B, Read, DB, Weakley, J, Darrall-Jones, J, and Till, K. Validity of daily and weekly self-reported training load measures in adolescent athletes. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 1121-1126, 2017-The primary aim of the study was to assess the level of agreement between the criterion session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE30min) and a practical measure of a self-reported Web-based training load questionnaire 24 hours after training (sRPE24h) in adolescent athletes. The secondary aim was to assess the agreement between weekly summated sRPE24h values (∑sRPE24h) and a weekly Web-based training diary (sRPEweekly) for all field-based training accumulated on a subsequent training week. Thirty-six male adolescent rugby players (age, 16.7 ± 0.5 years) were recruited from a regional academy. Measures of sRPE30min were recorded 30 minutes after a typical field-based training session. Participants then completed the sRPE24h via a Web-based training load questionnaire 24 hours after training, reporting both session duration and intensity. In addition, on a subsequent week, participants completed the sRPE24h daily and then completed the sRPEweekly at the end of the week, using the same Web-based platform, to recall all field-based training session durations and intensities over those 7 days. Biases were trivial between sRPE30min and sRPE24h for sRPE (0.3% [-0.9 to 1.5]), with nearly perfect correlations (0.99 [0.98-0.99]) and small typical error of the estimate (TEE; 4.3% [3.6-5.4]). Biases were trivial between ∑sRPE24h and sRPEweekly for sRPE (5.9% [-2.1 to 14.2]), with very large correlations (0.87 [0.78-0.93]) and moderate TEE of 28.5% [23.3-36.9]. The results of this study show that sRPE24h is a valid and robust method to quantify training loads in adolescent athletes. However, sRPEweekly was found to have a substantial TEE (28.5%), limiting practical application. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 51 | 51% |
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 5 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 64% |
| Scientists | 28 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 57 | 47% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#640,362
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#395
of 6,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,279
of 323,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#7
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.