↓ Skip to main content

Common and specific brain responses to scenic emotional stimuli

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Common and specific brain responses to scenic emotional stimuli
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00429-013-0580-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joaquim Radua, Salvador Sarró, Teresa Vigo, Silvia Alonso-Lana, C. Mar Bonnín, Jordi Ortiz-Gil, Erick J. Canales-Rodríguez, Teresa Maristany, Eduard Vieta, Peter J. Mckenna, Raymond Salvador, Edith Pomarol-Clotet

Abstract

Processing of emotions has been an enduring topic of interest in neuroimaging research, but studies have mostly used facial emotional stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine neural networks involved in emotion processing using scenic emotional visual stimuli. One hundred and twenty photographs from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), including ecological scenes of disgust, fear, happiness, and sadness, were presented to 40 healthy participants while they underwent functional magnetic imaging resonance (fMRI). Afterwards they evaluated the emotional content of the pictures in an offline task. The occipito-temporal cortex and the amygdala-hippocampal complex showed a non-specific emotion-related activation, which was more marked in response to negative emotions than to happiness. The temporo-parietal cortex and the ventral anterior cingulate gyrus showed deactivation, with the former being marked for all emotions except fear and the latter being most marked for disgust. The fusiform gyrus showed activation in response to disgust and deactivation in response to happiness or sadness. Brain regions involved in processing of scenic emotion therefore resemble those reported for facial expressions of emotion in that they respond to a range of different emotions, although there appears to be specificity in the intensity and direction of the response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 4%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#15,603,309
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#848
of 1,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,313
of 200,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.