| Title |
A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10640-010-9450-x |
| Authors |
Richard T. Carson, Jordan J. Louviere |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 229 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 18% |
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 78 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 23% |
| Unknown | 41 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,376,581
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#154
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,187
of 197,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.