↓ Skip to main content

Effects of intraword and interword spacing on eye movements during reading: Exploring the optimal use of space in a line of text

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Effects of intraword and interword spacing on eye movements during reading: Exploring the optimal use of space in a line of text
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, May 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13414-013-0463-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy J. Slattery, Keith Rayner

Abstract

Two eye movement experiments investigated intraword spacing (the space between letters within words) and interword spacing (the space between words) to explore the influence these variables have on eye movement control during reading. Both variables are important factors in determining the optimal use of space in a line of text, and fonts differ widely in how they employ these spaces. Prior research suggests that the proximity of flanking letters influences the identification of a central letter via lateral inhibition or crowding. If so, decrements in intraword spacing may produce inhibition in word processing. Still other research suggests that increases in intraword spacing can disrupt the integrity of word units. In English, interword spacing has a large influence on word segmentation and is important for saccade target selection. The results indicate an interplay between intra- and interword spacing that influences a font's readability. Additionally, these studies highlight the importance of word segmentation processes and have implications for the nature of lexical processing (serial vs. parallel).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 35%
Linguistics 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,301,120
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#267
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,330
of 197,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.