↓ Skip to main content

Gender Affirmation: A Framework for Conceptualizing Risk Behavior Among Transgender Women of Color

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
452 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
445 Mendeley
Title
Gender Affirmation: A Framework for Conceptualizing Risk Behavior Among Transgender Women of Color
Published in
Sex Roles, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11199-012-0216-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae M. Sevelius

Abstract

Experiences of stigma, discrimination, and violence as well as extreme health disparities and high rates of sexual risk behavior and substance use have been well-documented among transgender women of color. Using an intersectional approach and integrating prominent theories from stigma, eating disorders, and HIV-related research, this article offers a new framework for conceptualizing risk behavior among transgender women of color, specifically sexual risk behavior and risky body modification practices. This framework is centered on the concept of 'gender affirmation,' the process by which individuals are affirmed in their gender identity through social interactions. Qualitative data from 22 interviews with transgender women of color from the San Francisco Bay Area in the United States are analyzed and discussed in the context of the gender affirmation framework.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 445 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 434 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 15%
Student > Master 56 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Researcher 51 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 11%
Other 72 16%
Unknown 97 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 107 24%
Social Sciences 90 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 7%
Arts and Humanities 13 3%
Other 30 7%
Unknown 122 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#886,296
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#260
of 2,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,956
of 191,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.