↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Teriparatide or Risedronate in Elderly Patients With a Recent Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture: Final Results of a 78‐Week Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Teriparatide or Risedronate in Elderly Patients With a Recent Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture: Final Results of a 78‐Week Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1002/jbmr.3067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Malouf‐Sierra, Umberto Tarantino, Pedro A García‐Hernández, Costantino Corradini, Søren Overgaard, Jan J Stepan, Lars Borris, Eric Lespessailles, Frede Frihagen, Kyriakos Papavasiliou, Helmut Petto, Per Aspenberg, José Ramón Caeiro, Fernando Marin

Abstract

We present final results of a study comparing teriparatide 20 µg QD with risedronate 35 mg QW started within 2 weeks after surgery for a pertrochanteric hip fracture. Patients with BMD T-score ≤-2.0 and 25OHD >9.2 ng/mL were randomized to receive 26-week double-dummy treatment plus calcium and vitamin D, followed by 52-week open-label treatment with the same assigned active drug. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) BMD at 78 weeks. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were change in BMD at the proximal femur, function, hip pain (Charnley score and 100 mm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), quality of life (short form-36), radiology outcomes, and safety. Data were analyzed with MMRM and logistic regression. Totally, 224 patients were randomized; 171 (teriparatide: 86) contributed to the efficacy analyses (mean [SD] age: 77 [7.7] years, 77% females). Mean baseline LS, femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) T-scores were -2.16, -2.63, and -2.51, respectively. At 78 weeks, BMD increased significantly more with teriparatide compared to risedronate at the LS (+11.08% vs +6.45%; p < 0.001) and FN (+1.96% vs -1.19%; p = 0.003), with no significant between-group difference in TH BMD. Timed up-and-go (TUG) test was significantly faster with teriparatide at 6, 12, 18, and 26 weeks (differences: -3.2 to -5.9 seconds; p = 0.045 for overall difference). Hip pain during TUG test by 100 mm VAS was significantly lower with teriparatide at 18 weeks (adjusted difference: -11.3 mm, p = 0.033; -10.0 and -9.3 mm at 12 and 26 weeks; p = 0.079 for overall difference). Other secondary and exploratory outcomes were not different. Teriparatide group showed 2 new hip fractures versus 7 with risedronate (p = 0.171) and more frequent hypercalcemia and hyperuricemia. In conclusion, 78-week treatment with teriparatide showed significantly greater increases in LS and FN BMD, less pain, and a faster TUG test versus risedronate. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 34 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,215,764
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#2,057
of 4,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,939
of 422,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#21
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.