Title |
Reason for Revision TKA Predicts Clinical Outcome: Prospective Evaluation of 150 Consecutive Patients With 2-years Followup
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-2940-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robin W. T. M. van Kempen, Janneke J. P. Schimmel, Gijs G. van Hellemondt, Hilde Vandenneucker, Ate B. Wymenga |
Abstract |
There is limited knowledge regarding the relationship between the reason for revising a TKA and the clinical outcome in terms of satisfaction, pain, and function with time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 22% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 12% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,580,596
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,304
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,661
of 212,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#91
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.