Title |
Modifiable exposures to air pollutants related to asthma phenotypes in the first year of life in children of the EDEN mother-child cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-506 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cailiang Zhou, Nour Baïz, Tuohong Zhang, Soutrik Banerjee, Isabella Annesi-Maesano, The EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group |
Abstract |
Studies have shown diverse strength of evidence for the associations between air pollutants and childhood asthma, but these associations have scarcely been documented in the early life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of various air pollutants on the development of asthma phenotypes in the first year of life. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 29% |
Researcher | 15 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 10% |
Engineering | 5 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2016.
All research outputs
#14,170,673
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,279
of 14,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,492
of 195,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#195
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,245 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.