↓ Skip to main content

Classification of thoracolumbar fractures and dislocations

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Classification of thoracolumbar fractures and dislocations
Published in
European Spine Journal, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00586-009-1114-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Max Aebi

Abstract

A classification of injuries is necessary in order to develop a common language for treatment indications and outcomes. Several classification systems have been proposed, the most frequently used is the Denis classification. The problem of this classification system is that it is based on an assumption, which is anatomically unidentifiable: the so-called middle column. For this reason, few years ago, a group of spine surgeons has developed a new classification system, which is based on the severity of the injury. The severity is defined by the pathomorphological findings, the prognosis in terms of healing and potential of neurological damage. This classification is based on three major groups: A = isolated anterior column injuries by axial compression, B = disruption of the posterior ligament complex by distraction posteriorly, and group C = corresponding to group B but with rotation. There is an increasing severity from A to C, and within each group, the severity usually increases within the subgroups from .1, .2, .3. All these pathomorphologies are supported by a mechanism of injury, which is responsible for the extent of the injury. The type of injury with its groups and subgroups is able to suggest the treatment modality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 13%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 34 25%
Unknown 21 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 65%
Engineering 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,689,426
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,241
of 4,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,158
of 93,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.