You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
優生学と結びつく「からゆき」批判の検討
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
jenda shigaku, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.11365/genderhistory.5.21 |
| Authors |
嶽本 新奈 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 30 | 22% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 132 | 97% |
| Unknown | 4 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#392,816
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from jenda shigaku
#2
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,034
of 110,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from jenda shigaku
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one scored the same or higher as 42 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them