↓ Skip to main content

Novel Biomarkers to Detect Infection in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Novel Biomarkers to Detect Infection in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasties
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2998-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathias Glehr, Joerg Friesenbichler, Günter Hofmann, Gerwin Alexander Bernhardt, Maximilian Zacherl, Alexander Avian, Reinhard Windhager, Andreas Leithner

Abstract

A periprosthetic joint infection is one of the most challenging complications associated with THA and TKA. In the diagnostic process for detecting a periprosthetic joint infection, one of the most important steps is analysis of laboratory infection biomarkers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 27 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,750
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,161
of 207,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#51
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.