↓ Skip to main content

Factors driving the use of dermoscopy in Europe: a pan‐European survey

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Dermatology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors driving the use of dermoscopy in Europe: a pan‐European survey
Published in
British Journal of Dermatology, December 2016
DOI 10.1111/bjd.14895
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.M. Forsea, P. Tschandl, V. del Marmol, I. Zalaudek, H.P. Soyer, A.C. Geller, G. Argenziano, M. Arenbergerova, A. Azenha, A. Blum, J.C. Bowling, R.P. Braun, M. Bylaite-Bucinskiene, L. Čabrijan, H. Dobrev, J. Hegy, H. Helppikangas, R. Hofmann-Wellenhof, R. Karls, U. Krumkachou, N. Kukutsch, I. McCormack, L. Mekokishvili, N. Nathansohn, K. Nielsen, J. Olah, F. Özdemir, S. Puig, P. Rubegni, T. Planinsek Rucigaj, T.R. Schopf, V. Sergeev, A. Stratigos, L. Thomas, D. Tiodorovic, A. Vahlberg, Z. Zafirovik

Abstract

Dermoscopy used correctly is an essential tool helping clinicians in the diagnosis of skin diseases and the early detection of skin cancers. Despite its proven benefits, there is scarce evidence about the way dermoscopy is used in everyday practice by European dermatologists. To identify the motivations, obstacles, and modifiable factors influencing the use of dermoscopy in the daily dermatology practice across Europe. All registered dermatologists in 32 European countries were invited to an online survey of 20 questions regarding: the demographic and practice characteristics, dermoscopy training and self-confidence in dermoscopic skills, patterns of dermoscopy use, reasons of not using dermoscopy and attitudes on dermoscopy utility. We collected 7480 valid answers, out of which 89% reported using dermoscopy. The main reasons for not using dermoscopy were lack of equipment (58% of non-users) and lack of training (42%). Dermoscopy training during residency was reported by 41% of dermoscopy users and by 12% of non-users (p<0.001). Dermatologists working in public hospitals were the least likely to use dermoscopy. High use of dermoscopy across all the spectrum of skin diseases was reported by 62% of dermoscopy users and was associated with dermoscopy training during residency, the use of polarized light and digital dermoscopy devices, longer dermoscopy practice, younger age, and female gender. Expanding access to dermoscopy equipment, especially in public healthcare facilities and establishing dermoscopy training during dermatology residency would further enhance the substantially high dermoscopy use across European countries. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,741,336
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Dermatology
#1,796
of 9,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,094
of 423,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Dermatology
#28
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.