You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The REMEDEE Trial A Randomized Comparison of a Combination Sirolimus-Eluting Endothelial Progenitor Cell Capture Stent With a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Haude, Stephen W.L. Lee, Stephen G. Worthley, Sigmund Silber, Stefan Verheye, Sandra Erbs, Mohd Ali Rosli, Roberto Botelho, Ian Meredith, Kui Hian Sim, Pieter R. Stella, Huay-Cheem Tan, Robert Whitbourn, Sukumaran Thambar, Alexandre Abizaid, Tian Hai Koh, Peter Den Heijer, Helen Parise, Ecaterina Cristea, Akiko Maehara, Roxana Mehran |
| Abstract |
This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety results after coronary implantation of a combined sirolimus-eluting CD34 antibody coated Combo stent (OrbusNeich Medical, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida) with the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberté stent (PES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). This report summarizes the first-in-man randomized, controlled multicenter REMEDEE trial (Randomized study to Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an abluMinal sirolimus coatED bio-Engineered StEnt) angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical results up to 12 months. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,798,066
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#1,686
of 4,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,062
of 210,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.