| Title |
Vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a multiprofessional survey of practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-012-1985-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Bugge, Suzanne Hagen, Ranee Thakar |
| Abstract |
Vaginal pessaries may offer symptomatic improvement for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or urinary incontinence (UI). This study aimed to investigate multidisciplinary perspectives on vaginal pessary use in clinical practice and to understand the service organisation of vaginal pessary care for women with these conditions. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,853
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,901
of 285,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.