↓ Skip to main content

Brief Report: Does Eye Contact Induce Contagious Yawning in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Brief Report: Does Eye Contact Induce Contagious Yawning in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder?
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0785-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Senju, Yukiko Kikuchi, Hironori Akechi, Toshikazu Hasegawa, Yoshikuni Tojo, Hiroo Osanai

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) reportedly fail to show contagious yawning, but the mechanism underlying the lack of contagious yawning is still unclear. The current study examined whether instructed fixation on the eyes modulates contagious yawning in ASD. Thirty-one children with ASD, as well as 31 age-matched typically developing (TD) children, observed video clips of either yawning or control mouth movements. Participants were instructed to fixate to the eyes of the face stimuli. Following instructed fixation on the eyes, both TD children and children with ASD yawned equally frequently in response to yawning stimuli. Current results suggest that contagious yawning could occur in ASD under an experimental condition in which they are instructed to fixate on the yawning eyes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 115 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 19%
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Professor 8 7%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 28 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2016.
All research outputs
#13,940,461
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,390
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,684
of 101,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#33
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.