↓ Skip to main content

The recurrent assembly of C4 photosynthesis, an evolutionary tale

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The recurrent assembly of C4 photosynthesis, an evolutionary tale
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11120-013-9852-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal-Antoine Christin, Colin P. Osborne

Abstract

Today, plants using C4 photosynthesis are widespread and important components of major tropical and subtropical biomes, but the events that led to their evolution and success started billions of years ago (bya). A CO2-fixing enzyme evolved in the early Earth atmosphere with a tendency to confuse CO2 and O2 molecules. The descendants of early photosynthetic organisms coped with this property in the geological eras that followed through successive fixes, the latest of which is the addition of complex CO2-concentrating mechanisms such as C4 photosynthesis. This trait was assembled from bricks available in C3 ancestors, which were altered to fulfill their new role in C4 photosynthesis. The existence of C4-suitable bricks probably determined the lineages of plants that could make the transition to C4 photosynthesis, highlighting the power of contingency in evolution. Based on the latest findings in C4 research, we present the evolutionary tale of C4 photosynthesis, with a focus on the general evolutionary phenomena that it so wonderfully exemplifies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Brazil 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 89 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 24%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,599,333
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#169
of 790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,019
of 196,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 790 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.