↓ Skip to main content

The Emerging Zika Virus Threat: A Guide for Dermatologists

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
The Emerging Zika Virus Threat: A Guide for Dermatologists
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40257-016-0243-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice He, Patrícia Brasil, Andre M. Siqueira, Guilherme A. Calvet, Shawn G. Kwatra

Abstract

We provide a guide for dermatologists to follow if they encounter patients with a rash and clinical history suspicious of Zika virus infection, including diagnostic testing and management options. We also provide an illustrative case report of a patient from Brazil who was diagnosed with Zika virus infection after presenting with a generalized pruritic rash. One of the most prominent symptoms of Zika virus infection is a cutaneous eruption. As such, it is especially necessary for dermatologists to understand this virus so that they may appropriately recognize this entity as a diagnostic consideration in the clinic. The rash associated with Zika virus infection is most commonly an erythematous maculopapular eruption that presents after an initial 3-4 days of fever, headache, and arthralgia or myalgia. The rash typically lasts for an average of 6 days, and can spread to involve any part of the body, including the face, torso, extremities, palms, and soles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,021,919
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#663
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,954
of 421,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.