↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics and determinants of outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care units: the EUROBACT International Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
311 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics and determinants of outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care units: the EUROBACT International Cohort Study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2695-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis Tabah, Despoina Koulenti, Kevin Laupland, Benoit Misset, Jordi Valles, Frederico Bruzzi de Carvalho, José Artur Paiva, Nahit Çakar, Xiaochun Ma, Philippe Eggimann, Massimo Antonelli, Marc J. M. Bonten, Akos Csomos, Wolfgang A. Krueger, Adam Mikstacki, Jeffrey Lipman, Pieter Depuydt, Aurélien Vesin, Maité Garrouste-Orgeas, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Stijn Blot, Jean Carlet, Christian Brun-Buisson, Claude Martin, Jordi Rello, Georges Dimopoulos, Jean-François Timsit

Abstract

The recent increase in drug-resistant micro-organisms complicates the management of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs). We investigated the epidemiology of HA-BSI and evaluated the impact of drug resistance on outcomes of critically ill patients, controlling for patient characteristics and infection management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Montenegro 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 306 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 11%
Student > Postgraduate 33 10%
Researcher 26 8%
Other 61 19%
Unknown 89 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 4%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 99 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,119,195
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,495
of 5,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,771
of 179,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.