↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of genetic diversity in the sorghum reference set using EST-SSR markers

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Assessment of genetic diversity in the sorghum reference set using EST-SSR markers
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00122-013-2117-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Ramu, C. Billot, J-F. Rami, S. Senthilvel, H. D. Upadhyaya, L. Ananda Reddy, C. T. Hash

Abstract

Selection and use of genetically diverse genotypes are key factors in any crop breeding program to develop cultivars with a broad genetic base. Molecular markers play a major role in selecting diverse genotypes. In the present study, a reference set representing a wide range of sorghum genetic diversity was screened with 40 EST-SSR markers to validate both the use of these markers for genetic structure analyses and the population structure of this set. Grouping of accessions is identical in distance-based and model-based clustering methods. Genotypes were grouped primarily based on race within the geographic origins. Accessions derived from the African continent contributed 88.6 % of alleles confirming the African origin of sorghum. In total, 360 alleles were detected in the reference set with an average of 9 alleles per marker. The average PIC value was 0.5230 with a range of 0.1379-0.9483. Sub-race, guinea margaritiferum (Gma) from West Africa formed a separate cluster in close proximity to wild accessions suggesting that the Gma group represents an independent domestication event. Guineas from India and Western Africa formed two distinct clusters. Accessions belongs to the kafir race formed the most homogeneous group as observed in earlier studies. This analysis suggests that the EST-SSR markers used in the present study have greater discriminating power than the genomic SSRs. Genetic variance within the subpopulations was very high (71.7 %) suggesting that the germplasm lines included in the set are more diverse. Thus, this reference set representing the global germplasm is an ideal material for the breeding community, serving as a community resource for trait-specific allele mining as well as genome-wide association mapping.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Benin 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 95 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 25%
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,124
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,258
of 196,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.