↓ Skip to main content

共創型イノベーションを創出する:ニコニコ学会βの活動を通じて

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
共創型イノベーションを創出する:ニコニコ学会βの活動を通じて
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2017
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.59.666
Authors

江渡 浩一郎, 土井 裕人

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,879,916
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#256
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,977
of 421,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#11
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.