↓ Skip to main content

Deployment of the 1st Area Medical Laboratory in a Split-Based Configuration During the Largest Ebola Outbreak in History

Overview of attention for article published in Military Medicine, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deployment of the 1st Area Medical Laboratory in a Split-Based Configuration During the Largest Ebola Outbreak in History
Published in
Military Medicine, November 2016
DOI 10.7205/milmed-d-15-00484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony P Cardile, Christopher T Littell, Michael G Backlund, Richard A Heipertz, Jerod A Brammer, Sean M Palmer, Todd J Vento, Felix A Ortiz, William R Rosa, Michael J Major, Patrick M Garman

Abstract

The U.S. Army 1(st) Area Medical Laboratory (1(st) AML) is currently the only deployable medical CBRNE (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosives) laboratory in the Army's Forces Command. In support of the United States Agency for International Development Ebola response, the U.S. military initiated Operation United Assistance (OUA), and deployed approximately 2,500 service members to support the Government of Liberia's Ebola control efforts. Due to its unique molecular diagnostic and expeditionary capabilities, the 1(st) AML was ordered to deploy in October of 2014 in support of OUA via establishment of Ebola testing laboratories. To meet the unique mission requirements of OUA, the unit was re-organized to operate in a split-based configuration and sustain four separate Ebola testing laboratories. This article is a review of the 1(st) AML's OUA participation in a split-based configuration. Topics highlighted include pre-deployment planning/training, operational/logistical considerations in fielding/withdrawing laboratories, laboratory testing results, disease and non-battle injuries, and lessons learned. Fielding the 1(st) AML in a split-based configuration required careful pre-deployment planning, additional training, optimal use of personnel, and the acquisition of additional laboratory equipment. Challenges in establishing and sustaining remote laboratories in Liberia included: difficulties in transportation of equipment due to poor road infrastructure, heavy equipment unloading, and equipment damage during transit. Between November 26, 2014 and February 18, 2015 the four 1(st) AML labs successfully tested blood samples from patients and oral swabs collected by burial teams in rural Liberia. The most significant equipment malfunction during laboratory operations was generators powering the labs, with the same problem impacting headquarters. Generator failures delayed laboratory operations/result reporting, and put temperature sensitive reagents at risk. None of the 22 1(st) AML soldiers (at remote labs or headquarters) had an Ebola exposure, none were infected with malaria or other tropical diseases, and none required evacuation from the time deployed to remote sites. The primary medical condition encountered was acute gastroenteritis, and within the first week of arrival to Liberia, 19 (86%) soldiers were affected. With proper planning and training, the 1(st) AML can successfully conduct split-based operations in an outbreak setting, and this capability can be utilized in future operations. The performance of the 1(st) AML during the current Ebola outbreak highlights the value of this asset, and the need to continue its evolution to support U.S. military operations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 21%
Social Sciences 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,376,559
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Military Medicine
#2,985
of 3,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,315
of 311,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Military Medicine
#32
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.