↓ Skip to main content

Efficient C sequestration and benefits of medicinal vetiver cropping in tropical regions

Overview of attention for article published in Agronomy for Sustainable Development, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Efficient C sequestration and benefits of medicinal vetiver cropping in tropical regions
Published in
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13593-013-0184-3
Authors

Munnu Singh, Neha Guleria, Eranki V. S. Prakasa Rao, Prashant Goswami

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 42%
Environmental Science 5 16%
Engineering 3 10%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#561
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,545
of 210,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.