↓ Skip to main content

Regeneration: The origin of cancer or a possible cure?

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regeneration: The origin of cancer or a possible cure?
Published in
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, April 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.04.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Néstor J. Oviedo, Wendy S. Beane

Abstract

A better understanding of the forces controlling cell growth will be essential for developing effective therapies in regenerative medicine and cancer. Historically, the literature has linked cancer and tissue regeneration-proposing regeneration as both the source of cancer and a method to inhibit tumorigenesis. This review discusses two powerful regeneration models, the vertebrate urodele amphibians and invertebrate planarians, in light of cancer regulation. Urodele limb and eye lens regeneration is described, as well as the planarian's emergence as a molecular and genetic model system in which recent insights begin to molecularly dissect cancer and regeneration in adult tissues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Portugal 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 222 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 17%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 48 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 59 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 56 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,795,392
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
#323
of 2,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,959
of 107,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.