↓ Skip to main content

Cardiopoietic cell therapy for advanced ischemic heart failure: results at 39 weeks of the prospective, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled CHART-1 clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiopoietic cell therapy for advanced ischemic heart failure: results at 39 weeks of the prospective, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled CHART-1 clinical trial
Published in
European Heart Journal, December 2016
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw543
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jozef Bartunek, Andre Terzic, Beth A. Davison, Gerasimos S. Filippatos, Slavica Radovanovic, Branko Beleslin, Bela Merkely, Piotr Musialek, Wojciech Wojakowski, Peter Andreka, Ivan G. Horvath, Amos Katz, Dariouch Dolatabadi, Badih El Nakadi, Aleksandra Arandjelovic, Istvan Edes, Petar M. Seferovic, Slobodan Obradovic, Marc Vanderheyden, Nikola Jagic, Ivo Petrov, Shaul Atar, Majdi Halabi, Valeri L. Gelev, Michael K. Shochat, Jaroslaw D. Kasprzak, Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz, Guy R. Heyndrickx, Noémi Nyolczas, Victor Legrand, Antoine Guédès, Alex Heyse, Tiziano Moccetti, Francisco Fernandez-Aviles, Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo, Antoni Bayes-Genis, Jose Maria Hernandez-Garcia, Flavio Ribichini, Marcin Gruchala, Scott A. Waldman, John R. Teerlink, Bernard J. Gersh, Thomas J. Povsic, Timothy D. Henry, Marco Metra, Roger J. Hajjar, Michal Tendera, Atta Behfar, Bertrand Alexandre, Aymeric Seron, Wendy Gattis Stough, Warren Sherman, Gad Cotter, William Wijns, for the CHART Program

Abstract

Cardiopoietic cells, produced through cardiogenic conditioning of patients' mesenchymal stem cells, have shown preliminary efficacy. The Congestive Heart Failure Cardiopoietic Regenerative Therapy (CHART-1) trial aimed to validate cardiopoiesis-based biotherapy in a larger heart failure cohort. This multinational, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study was conducted in 39 hospitals. Patients with symptomatic ischemic heart failure on guideline-directed therapy (n = 484) were screened; n = 348 underwent bone marrow harvest and mesenchymal stem cell expansion. Those achieving > 24 million mesenchymal stem cells (n = 315) were randomized to cardiopoietic cells delivered endomyocardially with a retention-enhanced catheter (n = 157) or sham procedure (n = 158). Procedures were performed as randomized in 271 patients (n = 120 cardiopoietic cells, n = 151 sham). The primary efficacy endpoint was a Finkelstein-Schoenfeld hierarchical composite (all-cause mortality, worsening heart failure, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, 6-min walk distance, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction) at 39 weeks. The primary outcome was neutral (Mann-Whitney estimator 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.61 [value > 0.5 favours cell treatment], P = 0.27). Exploratory analyses suggested a benefit of cell treatment on the primary composite in patients with baseline left ventricular end-diastolic volume 200-370 mL (60% of patients) (Mann-Whitney estimator 0.61, 95% CI 0.52-0.70, P = 0.015). No difference was observed in serious adverse events. One (0.9%) cardiopoietic cell patient and 9 (5.4%) sham patients experienced aborted or sudden cardiac death. The primary endpoint was neutral, with safety demonstrated across the cohort. Further evaluation of cardiopoietic cell therapy in patients with elevated end-diastolic volume is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 194 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Professor 15 8%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 49 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 62 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,220,392
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#1,884
of 11,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,570
of 429,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#14
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.