↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
232 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
507 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1151 Mendeley
Title
The Effects of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review
Published in
Sports Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0672-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeroen Van Cutsem, Samuele Marcora, Kevin De Pauw, Stephen Bailey, Romain Meeusen, Bart Roelands

Abstract

Mental fatigue is a psychobiological state caused by prolonged periods of demanding cognitive activity. It has recently been suggested that mental fatigue can affect physical performance. Our objective was to evaluate the literature on impairment of physical performance due to mental fatigue and to create an overview of the potential factors underlying this effect. Two electronic databases, PubMed and Web of Science (until 28 April 2016), were searched for studies designed to test whether mental fatigue influenced performance of a physical task or influenced physiological and/or perceptual responses during the physical task. Studies using short (<30 min) self-regulatory depletion tasks were excluded from the review. A total of 11 articles were included, of which six were of strong and five of moderate quality. The general finding was a decline in endurance performance (decreased time to exhaustion and self-selected power output/velocity or increased completion time) associated with a higher than normal perceived exertion. Physiological variables traditionally associated with endurance performance (heart rate, blood lactate, oxygen uptake, cardiac output, maximal aerobic capacity) were unaffected by mental fatigue. Maximal strength, power, and anaerobic work were not affected by mental fatigue. The duration and intensity of the physical task appear to be important factors in the decrease in physical performance due to mental fatigue. The most important factor responsible for the negative impact of mental fatigue on endurance performance is a higher perceived exertion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 1149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 185 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 151 13%
Student > Bachelor 138 12%
Researcher 81 7%
Student > Postgraduate 43 4%
Other 182 16%
Unknown 371 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 337 29%
Psychology 71 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 5%
Engineering 49 4%
Other 161 14%
Unknown 416 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#155,096
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#142
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,345
of 425,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.