↓ Skip to main content

Measuring Symptomatic and Functional Recovery in Patients with Community‐Acquired Pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Measuring Symptomatic and Functional Recovery in Patients with Community‐Acquired Pneumonia
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00074.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua P. Metlay, Michael J. Fine, Richard Schulz, Thomas J. Marrie, Christopher M. Coley, Wishwa N. Kapoor, Daniel E. Singer

Abstract

To determine the rates of resolution of symptoms and return to premorbid health status and assess the association of these outcomes with health care utilization in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A prospective, multicenter cohort study. Inpatient and outpatient facilities at three university hospitals, one community hospital, and one staff-model health maintenance organization. Five hundred seventy-six adults (aged > or = 18 years) with clinical and radiographic evidence of pneumonia, judged by a validated pneumonia severity index to be at low risk of dying. The presence and severity of five symptoms (cough, fatigue, dyspnea, sputum, and chest pain) were recorded through questionnaires administered at four time points: 0, 7, 30, and 90 days from the time of radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia. A summary symptom score was tabulated as the sum of the five individual severity scores. Patients also provided responses to the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and reported the number of and reason for outpatient physician visits. Symptoms and health status 30 days before pneumonia onset (prepneumonia) were obtained at the initial interview. All symptoms, except pleuritic chest pain, were still commonly reported at 30 days, and the prevalence of each symptom at 90 days was still nearly twice prepneumonia levels. Physical health measures derived from the SF-36 Form declined significantly at presentation but continued to improve over all three follow-up time periods. Patients with elevated symptom scores at day 7 or day 30 were significantly more likely to report pneumonia-related ambulatory care visits at the subsequent day 30 or day 90 interviews, respectively. Disease-specific symptom resolution and recovery of the premorbid physical health status requires more than 30 days for many patients with pneumonia. Delayed resolution of symptoms is associated with increased utilization of outpatient physician visits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Other 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 22 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#445,758
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#348
of 8,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264
of 49,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.