Title |
Computational tools and workflows in metabolomics: An international survey highlights the opportunity for harmonisation through Galaxy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Metabolomics, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11306-016-1147-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ralf J. M. Weber, Thomas N. Lawson, Reza M. Salek, Timothy M. D. Ebbels, Robert C. Glen, Royston Goodacre, Julian L. Griffin, Kenneth Haug, Albert Koulman, Pablo Moreno, Markus Ralser, Christoph Steinbeck, Warwick B. Dunn, Mark R. Viant |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
United States | 3 | 10% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Myanmar | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
Scientists | 11 | 35% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 141 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 24% |
Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 22% |
Chemistry | 19 | 13% |
Computer Science | 11 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,911,680
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#73
of 1,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,364
of 430,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.