↓ Skip to main content

Indication for surgical treatment in patients with adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis – a critical appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Safety in Surgery, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Indication for surgical treatment in patients with adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis – a critical appraisal
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1754-9493-7-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans-Rudolf Weiss, Marc Moramarco

Abstract

A recent literature search of the pertinent publications in the field revealed that there is poor evidence that would support surgical intervention in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). With complications estimated to exceed 50% over a lifetime, surgical intervention is unwarranted in the 'Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis' AIS population. In the relatively benign population of patients with AIS, according to the findings in literature, we may conclude that the long-term outcome of surgery for AIS creates a more negative end result over the course of a lifetime than the natural history of the condition itself.As a result, surgeons electing to recommend surgery are strongly advised to openly discuss and inform patients of the long-term probability of potential complications occurring after spinal fusion surgery, and document their explanations accordingly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Engineering 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 14 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient Safety in Surgery
#138
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,013
of 207,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Safety in Surgery
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.