↓ Skip to main content

レジスタンス運動と有酸素性運動の実施順が筋タンパク質同化応答を決定する

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 226)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
レジスタンス運動と有酸素性運動の実施順が筋タンパク質同化応答を決定する
Published in
Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.7600/jspfsm.63.146
Authors

小笠原 理紀, 佐藤 幸治, 松谷 健司, 中里 浩一, 藤田 聡

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,306,241
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine
#14
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,709
of 319,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness & Sports Medicine
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.