You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pathophysiology of white-nose syndrome in bats: a mechanistic model linking wing damage to mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology Letters, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Warnecke, James M. Turner, Trent K. Bollinger, Vikram Misra, Paul M. Cryan, David S. Blehert, Gudrun Wibbelt, Craig K. R. Willis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 72 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#3,122
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,686
of 213,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#40
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.