You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
日常診療でよくみる自己免疫脳症の診察ポイントと治療の実際
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neurological Therapeutics, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.15082/jsnt.33.5_s128 |
Authors |
髙嶋 博 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 13 | 33% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 25 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 39 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,333,428
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Therapeutics
#3
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,956
of 333,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Therapeutics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.