↓ Skip to main content

Effect of major gastrointestinal tract surgery on the absorption and efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,077)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
163 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Effect of major gastrointestinal tract surgery on the absorption and efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11239-016-1465-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hakeam A. Hakeam, Nasser Al-Sanea

Abstract

Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced as alternatives to warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Many patients undergoing major gastrointestinal resections or bypass receive anticoagulants for various indications, including the treatment of thrombotic complication of surgery and prevention of visceral vessels events recurrence. DOACs have a wide therapeutic range that allows fixed dosing determined based on studies conducted in healthy subjects with normal absorptive capacity. Patients with significantly altered gastrointestinal tracts were not included in the Phase II and III studies that assessed DOAC efficacy and safety. The aim of this article is to review clinical data on DOACs use in patients with major surgical resection or bypass. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to identify studies and case reports of DOAC use in this population. Prescribing information for the four approved DOACs was also reviewed. The only types of available literature identified were case series and isolated case reports. Patients who underwent major distal intestinal resection were successfully anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, dabigatran was not effective. There is uncertainty about the efficacy of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients requiring anticoagulation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Avoidance of rivaroxaban therapy in patients undergoing gastrectomy is advised Data are lacking regarding anticoagulation using apixaban and edoxaban in patients with major gastrointestinal resection or bypass is lacking. Clinicians should be aware of these limitations when using DOACs in this group of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 17%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 47 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#325,360
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#9
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,784
of 424,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.