↓ Skip to main content

A Dark Side of the Cannula Injections: How Arterial Wall Perforations and Emboli Occur

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,226)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
A Dark Side of the Cannula Injections: How Arterial Wall Perforations and Emboli Occur
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00266-016-0725-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanvaa Tansatit, Prawit Apinuntrum, Thavorn Phetudom

Abstract

Though most injectors prefer to use a cannula rather than a needle, there have been reported cases of blindness following cannula injections. This study investigated possible situations in which a cannula can injure an artery to gain more insight about the vascular complication and its prevention. To understand how an arterial injury occurs, five situations favoring vascular injury were simulated and tested. Experiments were performed in 100 arterial segments of 10 soft embalmed cadavers with red latex injections to the arteries. The frontal branch of the superficial temporal artery with a diameter between 1.2 and 1.5 mm was chosen for the experiment with a 25G cannula. Five situations were created to simulate any possibility that the cannula can penetrate through the arterial wall. Two factors were varied for simulation of specific danger situations. Factors that vary were as follows: (1) the angles between the cannula and the artery when the cannula touched the artery, and (2) the segments of the artery with different features. The cannula could penetrate the arterial wall in some specific situations with a different chance in each situation. The perpendicular angle between the artery and the cannula was one of the essential situations for vascular injury. Situations that had a similar effect of the perpendicular arterial surface related to the cannula axis also favored vascular injuries. During a blinded insertion of cannula injections to reach the target area, the injector cannot discriminate the sensation at the cannula tip between the resistance of a fibrous septum in the way of the insertion and the resistance of encountering an artery. To prevent arterial emboli, the cannula trajectory should not be close to the main artery in the region. This allows a physician to safely perform an intermittent forceful insertion without an arterial injury during an attempt to perform a gentle cannula insertion. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors. www.springer.com/00266 .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 54%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,671,255
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#47
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,788
of 420,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.