| Title |
Mitochondrial Pruning by Nix and BNip3: An Essential Function for Cardiac-Expressed Death Factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12265-010-9174-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerald W. Dorn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 23% |
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#205
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,639
of 94,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.