↓ Skip to main content

The Role of the Cerebellum in Cognition and Emotion: Personal Reflections Since 1982 on the Dysmetria of Thought Hypothesis, and Its Historical Evolution from Theory to Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 453)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
519 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
495 Mendeley
Title
The Role of the Cerebellum in Cognition and Emotion: Personal Reflections Since 1982 on the Dysmetria of Thought Hypothesis, and Its Historical Evolution from Theory to Therapy
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11065-010-9142-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy D. Schmahmann

Abstract

The cognitive neuroscience of the cerebellum is now an established multidisciplinary field of investigation. This essay traces the historical evolution of this line of inquiry from an emerging field to its current status, with personal reflections over almost three decades on this journey of discovery. It pays tribute to early investigators who recognized the wider role of the cerebellum beyond motor control, traces the origins of new terms and concepts including the dysmetria of thought theory, the universal cerebellar transform, and the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome, and places these developments within the broader context of the scientific efforts of a growing community of cerebellar cognitive neuroscientists. This account considers the converging evidence from theoretical, anatomical, physiological, clinical, and functional neuroimaging approaches that have resulted in the transition from recognizing the cerebellar incorporation into the distributed neural circuits subserving cognition and emotion, to a hopeful new era of treatment of neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations of cerebellar diseases, and to cerebellar-based interventions for psychiatric disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Brazil 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 465 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 100 20%
Researcher 90 18%
Student > Master 66 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 7%
Other 110 22%
Unknown 56 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 25%
Neuroscience 101 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 81 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 78 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,145,184
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#32
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,639
of 95,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.