↓ Skip to main content

The role of dextromethorphan in pain control

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
132 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
The role of dextromethorphan in pain control
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, June 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf03018952
Pubmed ID
Authors

Avi A. Weinbroum, Valery Rudick, Gideon Paret, Ron Ben-Abraham

Abstract

To review the clinical benefits of dextromethorphan (DM) in pain management, describe its neuropharmacological properties. A Medline search was made for experimental and clinical data on DM use from 1967 to date using keywords nociception, acute and chronic pain control, N-methyl-D-aspartate, antagonists, dextromethorphan. The 930 DM citations mostly described its antitussive, metabolic and toxicological aspects, animal studies and its possible role in minimizing post-brain ischemia complications in humans. The use of DM in acute pain revealed eight original studies involving 443 patients, as well as two preliminary reports and our own unpublished data on 513 patients. Most of the 956 patients had general anesthesia. Eight studies (154 patients) and one case report dealt with chronic pain management. This N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist binds to receptor sites in the spinal cord and central nervous system, thereby blocking the generation of central acute and chronic pain sensations arising from peripheral nociceptive stimuli and enabling reduction in the amount of analgesics required for pain control. DM attenuated the sensation of acute pain at doses of 30-90 mg, without major side effects, and reduced the amount of analgesics in 73% of the postoperative DM-treated patients. Studies in secondary pain models in healthy volunteers and in various types of chronic pain showed DM to be associated with unsatisfactory pain relief. DM attenuates acute pain sensation with tolerable side effects. Its availability in oral form bestow advantages over other NMDA antagonists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 26%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Psychology 6 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,690,562
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#730
of 2,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,718
of 40,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them