↓ Skip to main content

Changes in Rice Allelopathy and Rhizosphere Microflora by Inhibiting Rice Phenylalanine Ammonia-lyase Gene Expression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Changes in Rice Allelopathy and Rhizosphere Microflora by Inhibiting Rice Phenylalanine Ammonia-lyase Gene Expression
Published in
Journal of Chemical Ecology, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10886-013-0249-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changxun Fang, Yuee Zhuang, Tiecheng Xu, Yingzhe Li, Yue Li, Wenxiong Lin

Abstract

Gene expression of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) in allelopathic rice PI312777 was inhibited by RNA interference (RNAi). Transgenic rice showed lower levels of PAL gene expression and PAL activity than wild type rice (WT). The concentrations of phenolic compounds were lower in the root tissues and root exudates of transgenic rice than in those of wild type plants. When barndyardgrass (BYG) was used as the receiver plant, the allelopathic potential of transgenic rice was reduced. The sizes of the bacterial and fungal populations in rice rhizospheric soil at the 3-, 5-, and 7-leaf stages were estimated by using quantitative PCR (qPCR), which showed a decrease in both populations at all stages of leaf development analyzed. However, PI312777 had a larger microbial population than transgenic rice. In addition, in T-RFLP studies, 14 different groups of bacteria were detected in WT and only 6 were detected in transgenic rice. This indicates that there was less rhizospheric bacterial diversity associated with transgenic rice than with WT. These findings collectively suggest that PAL functions as a positive regulator of rice allelopathic potential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Estonia 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1,746
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,404
of 283,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.