↓ Skip to main content

Weight Loss and Nutritional Outcomes 10 Years after Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Weight Loss and Nutritional Outcomes 10 Years after Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch
Published in
Obesity Surgery, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11695-016-2537-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Topart, Guillaume Becouarn, Jacques Delarue

Abstract

Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) is the most effective bariatric surgical procedure, but major concerns exist about the nutritional consequences. The study reported weight loss and nutritional outcomes of 80 patients with a follow-up of at least 10 years. The follow-up was conducted at a university hospital as well as in a private practice institution in France. Eighty patients operated on between February 2002 and May 2006 were reviewed. Weight outcomes were analyzed as well as complete biological status. Revisions were reported as well as the number of patients taking vitamin supplementation. A follow-up of 141 ± 16 months was available for 87.7% of the patients at least 10 years from surgery. Preoperative BMI decreased from 48.9 ± 7.3 to 31.2 ± 6.2 kg/m(2) with an EWL of 73.4 ± 26.7% and a TWL of 35.9% ± 17.7%. Despite weight regain ≥10% of the weight loss in 61% of the cases, 78% of the patients maintained a BMI <35. Fourteen percent of the patients had a revision. Normal vitamin D levels were found in 35.4%. The overall PTH level was 91.9 ± 79.5 ng/mL, and 62% of the patients had hyperparathyroidism. Other deficiencies were less frequent but fat-soluble deficiencies as well as a PTH >100 ng/mL were significantly associated with the absence of vitamin supplementation. BPD/DS maintains a significant weight loss, but remains associated with side effects leading to revision and multiple vitamin deficiencies. The most severe deficiencies are related to the lack of supplementation compliance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,504,575
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,557
of 3,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,072
of 421,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#41
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.